Ketogenic Lifestyle

Start today with a species appropriate diet

Mobirise

We promise to tell the truth..

- What is the point in having a mind if you never change it
- Your health and that of your family and friends matters
- Our App can and has changed health outcomes
- We have made FREE what other programmes charge for
- We have merged what low carb Dr's use clinically
- Challenge what you have been taught about food
- Did your Grand Parents eat like that?
- What foods were eaten before the diabesity crisis
- Were "we" slimmer in the early to mid 1900's?
- Is modern processed food better than historical
- This site is an information portal and FREE health App
- Learn the health markers you should know - no agenda
- No guesswork.  Route 1 direction to what to eat
- Enough science sprinkled with common sense
- Do you know about glucose, insulin, leptin - you should
- Katie and Moyle Baker want to share food truths

Have you ever wondered why there are so many diets, whilst obesity and ill health continue to rise.  Diets can work, but they are fundamentally flawed; as they either do not address satiety, nutritional density, variety and have an ideological agenda and profit motive, our system is FREE.  Yes free, with 12 modules to assist you obtain your goals.

A well formulated animal based Ketogenic dietary eating pattern is the easiest and most sustainable method to fat loss and chronic condition management.  You have been misled for 2 generations into believing fake food is best for you.  Big cereal and pharma need you to buy cheap high carb foods.  A little experiment and you will see that food like items dominate - see if what you have mainly consists of 3 ingredients being: vegetable oil, sugar and grains.  Every population that has these elements suffers diabetes, hypertension, basically almost all diseases over the last 50 years.  When these elements are remove remission occurs.  Give our programme a chance to prove this.  Our experts have the same qualifications as the guideline makers, they are just not on the boards that make decisions.  Ketogenic lifestyles get the best results, this is why threatened industry and influencers attack this not for profit methodology - they need to help sell something in a packet or bottle.

We have even been told that humans can thrive on vegetables and grains with supplements.  Keto-carnivore is what Moyle Baker has settled on to put his Type 2 Diabetes into remission for 5 years (officially two and three quarter years via the NHS).  We invite you to hear and watch the other side.  Seriously would you really believe a man made food with 15 ingredients beats natures single ingredient super foods?  If you take the time to hear us out, use the App, we promise you life improvements.

Our Health Prescription
Ketodoit App

Fat Loss
No gimmicks.

You've come to the right place.  The foods we use for condition management reduces body fat as well.  This is because we target insulin, the fat storage hormone.  No need to calorie count as we just watch carbohydrates.  Excess carbs turn to fat (triglycerides), our method negates this.  Look at our meal samples below.

plan
Food Plan
Practical and doable.

Do you have a medical condition where you take pills or drugs to alleviate the symptoms - have you noticed you never get cured.  Diabetes can be officially reversed and or put into remission using a Low Carb Ketogenic or Carnivore diet, as can many other conditions.  Low fat and high carb has been a disaster for 50 years - enough already.

Lifestyle
There's more value.

Optionally put the icing on cake.  Let us guide you through some beginner to intermediate workouts.  Start with walking.  Maybe take our beginner Karate training, featuring a World & European champion.  We even have an ex-diabetic powering through a weights session.

sickness
Remission
Not just management.

Do you have a medical condition where you take pills or drugs to alleviate the symptoms - have you noticed you never get cured.  Diabetes can be officially reversed and or put into remission using a Low Carb Ketogenic or Carnivore diet, as can many other conditions.

Ketodoit Questions

The original "classic" Ketogenic diet was used to manage epilepsy since the 1920's, this means it is one the longest known formalised diets.  The UK's Epilepsy Society continue promote Ketogenic diets for those who do not get on with AED's (anti epileptic drugs).  3-4 grams of fat are set off against 1 gram of carboyhydrates and protein (87 - 90% fat).  It is not necessary to use these ratios for other conditions, such as diabetes.  All that is required is to produce measurable ketones, either via weeing on a stick, breathing into a registering device, or pricking a finger taking a drop of blood.

As mentioned above, there is no requirement to stick to a dogma about the ratios.  Our Ketogenic diet consists of a base of meat, fish, eggs or shell fish, cooked in anyway, but absent of any vegetable oil (where possible), animal fats such as lard, butter, tallow, duck fat are fine as is coconut oil, and olive oil for light frying (watch the smoke point with this oil).  We then add low sugar vegetables and fruit.  Diary is used if tolerated.  Our meals are not too dissimilar to traditional British meat and two veg, with a modern twist.  Here are some examples pulled pork greens & squash, Thai chicken curry, Chinese style duck & vegetables, Greek yogurt fruit & nuts.  Things can be as simple as sausage / bacon, tomato and eggs.

The objective of a ketogenic diet is to lower glucose, which creates an additional fuel source called ketones.  Ketones are a cleaner fuel than glucose.  Ketones are natural, babies are born in ketosis.  Modern industrialised high carb eating patterns do not allow glucose to lower to the point of significant bouts of ketosis; liver and bacon, meat and two veg, has been replaced by pasta, pizza, chips or breaded fried chicken.  Something sweet, cereal or bread based is eaten at each opportunity up to 6 times a day and considered normal, when the previous was a maximum of 3 (Jason Fung).

The rewards are unbelievable.  Truly.  Everyone deserves to experience what "we" feel, words cannot express the power of this natural intervention.  Fat loss, increased energy, clarity of thought, stable blood sugars, chronic condition potential reversal or better results than drug treatments (without the side effects). Animal based Ketogenic diets nourish the body completely meaning that food satiety is reached quickly.  This in turn is a gateway into fasting as an option.  Fasting speeds up fat loss and or resolution / relief of whatever condition present, such as migranes or IBS.  This translates to better work performance, relationships, quality of life and mood.

Would you like to turn fat into fuel, no calorie counting.  Enjoy full plates of food.  Only exercise as an optional extra.  Have no requirement to eat every 4 hours, the majority on a Ketogenic diet eat either one or 2 meals a day - yes really, with no hunger and even if they are athletic. No requirement to try to maintain weight with excessive exercise (exercise does however put the icing on the cake). Naturally reverses being overweight and Type 2 diabetes.  Is the best way to manages Type 1 diabetes (flat glucose, minimal insulin). The American Diabetes Association wrote a consensus report which states:

"Reducing overall carbohydrate intake for individuals with diabetes has demonstrated the most evidence for improving glycemia and may be applied in a variety of eating patterns that meet individual needs and preferences."

Similar to the ADA in America, the Western Australia government produced a report called the "Food Fix", with a similar landmark recommendation of the ADA in America to endorse a low carbohydate diet for Type 2 diabetics https://www.nutritioniq.com.au/post/the-food-fix (report)

That is 2 major authorites stating that low carbohydrate diets can be used for diabetics.  As up to 1 in 2 persons in the USA have either Type 2 diabetes or pre-diabetes and up to 88% have metabolic syndrome, common sense dictates that at least 50% of a major population could use a low carbohydrate dietary lifestyle - common sense?

The Ketogenic lifestyle supports the functions of the liver, kidneys, pancreas, eyes, circulation, thyroid, brain, nerves, heart, bones and muscles.

Some never measure anything.  Carbohydrates can be measured if optimising a condition is a requirement.  Some guidelines are that 100 grams of carbs a day is classified as a Low Carb Higher Fat amount around 50 grams is perhaps an amount to initially aim for and tune from there.  20 to 30 grams essentially guarantees getting into Ketosis.  These three areas are where the majority stay within.  It is possible to go lower on carbs, with some opting for zero.  Whilst it is not possible to entirely have zero carbs as trace amounts some persons either choose to or must do to resolve extremely chronic conditions such as crohn's disease.

That's right.  In the mainstream, low carb is often defined as a minimum of 130 grams a day, which is less than 25% of calories consumed.  50 grams of calories equates to less than 10% of calories a day from carbohydrates.

Are these lower amounts safe?  Yes and No.  Yes, In 2005 The National Academies of Sciences said that there are essential fatty acids and proteins which must be consumed for human life, but that there are no essential carbohydrates.  This is a technical fact, however "we" advocate low sugar carbohydrates.  If fats and protein are present within the diet, the body will convert these into the exact amounts required for the brain, the rest of the body will use ketones - this is a natural state that modern eating patterns prevent.

Yes to both.  You can decide what works best for you.  We are not robots, and we have different ancestral heritage, which does impact the ratios we can tolerate, in a similar manner to risks for Alzheimers or cancer.  Women may in general do better with a higher fat ratio to sure up hormones, but this is not universal.

Our meals use whole foods of an animal origin such as all meats, fish and shell fish. In addition low sugar fruit, vegetables and salads. If diary is tolerated this is also included along with nuts and seeds. We remove modern food like products with multiple ingredient and additives, many of which cannot be pronounced.

Absolutely safe and delicious. We've eaten red meat for millennia. The longest living population are from Hong Kong and they eat the most meat. Doesn't this contradict the mainstream push? Yes, in order to sell an alternative, the narrative has to be true, otherwise "fake" foods would be consigned to history. What about the evidence? Review it, the tricks are to use anti-meat testers and studies that do not pass the scientific threshold to prove anything.  The contributors to this site believed the mantra, and suffered IBS, fat and diabetes.  Katie Baker was trained 3 times in the low fat, high carb, grain based methods as a fitness trainer, sports scientist and a physiotherapist - she would practically assign nutrition in real world scenarios, only to bin the indoctrination in favour of simple food that nature provides as a single ingredient.

Understandable. Here's a common sense rationale. Indigenous populations such as the Inuit and Maasai eat mostly meat and do not suffer the same non-communicative diseases of Western societies, such as diabetes and hypertension. Here are some websites with real people and their successes on mostly meat based diets:
- Meatrx
- Diabetes.co.uk
- Diet Doctor
- We have our own small successes, which we intend to grow.

Meat is at the heart of these successes at very close to 100% of the cases. What about the weight of the evidence? There has never been a study that crosses the scientific threshold of proof. IARC say eating bacon raises a risk of bowel cancer to 18% or 51 in 100,000, the standard risk is 43 in 100,000. The statistical gymnastics to have a rise of 8 equate to 18%, is achieved by a method called relative risk. Whist relative risk is a legitimate measurement "they" know it is misleading. The 8 increase was gained by asking people what they ate via a food frequency questionnaire.....enough said, revert back to the section above regarding the longest lived and what they eat. On these questionnaires, pizza for example is classed as meat.

When it comes to risk, take a fast food meal of burger and chips. They would say the burger pattie increases risk, whilst hundreds of medical professionals say the risk is in the rancid vegetable oil, the sugary burger bun and the high carb fries - we are right, they are wrong.

Food choices have recently been framed in the "plant based paradigm" which favours commercial products not whole foods such as carrot or courgettes (always something packaged and mixed with loads of ingredients).  We prefer history to tell the truth about real food.  In Britain for example if you have relatives who are around 70 to 90 years old, ask them what they ate as a child.  Review for yourself what hunter gathers used to eat, and what those who still survive now eat (those not influenced by Western foods, such as in the Amazon).  The Maasi, Hadza, Inuit are good examples.  Most have in common a meat and or fish as the primary must have base of their diets with berries and tubers for subsistence (check this for yourself).  Below is an example of what the Commanche indians ate.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comanche):
The Comanche were initially hunter-gatherers. When they lived in the Rocky Mountains, during their migration to the Great Plains, both men and women shared the responsibility of gathering and providing food. When the Comanche reached the plains, hunting came to predominate. Hunting was considered a male activity and was a principal source of prestige. For meat, the Comanche hunted buffalo, elk, black bear, pronghorn, and deer. When game was scarce, the men hunted wild mustangs, sometimes eating their own ponies. In later years the Comanche raided Texas ranches and stole longhorn cattle. They did not eat fish or fowl, unless starving, when they would eat virtually any creature they could catch, including armadillos, skunks, rats, lizards, frogs, and grasshoppers. Buffalo meat and other game was prepared and cooked by the women. The women also gathered wild fruits, seeds, nuts, berries, roots, and tubers — including plums, grapes, juniper berries, persimmons, mulberries, acorns, pecans, wild onions, radishes, and the fruit of the prickly pear cactus. The Comanche also acquired maize, dried pumpkin, and tobacco through trade and raids. Most meats were roasted over a fire or boiled. To boil fresh or dried meat and vegetables, women dug a pit in the ground, which they lined with animal skins or buffalo stomach and filled with water to make a kind of cooking pot. They placed heated stones in the water until it boiled and had cooked their stew. After they came into contact with the Spanish, the Comanche traded for copper pots and iron kettles, which made cooking easier.

Women used berries and nuts, as well as honey and tallow, to flavor buffalo meat. They stored the tallow in intestine casings or rawhide pouches called oyóotû¿. They especially liked to make a sweet mush of buffalo marrow mixed with crushed mesquite beans.

The Comanches sometimes ate raw meat, especially raw liver flavored with gall. They also drank the milk from the slashed udders of buffalo, deer, and elk.  Among their delicacies was the curdled milk from the stomachs of suckling buffalo calves. They also enjoyed buffalo tripe, or stomachs.

Comanche people generally had a light meal in the morning and a large evening meal. During the day they ate whenever they were hungry or when it was convenient. Like other Plains Indians, the Comanche were very hospitable people. They prepared meals whenever a visitor arrived in camp, which led to outsiders' belief that the Comanches ate at all hours of the day or night. Before calling a public event, the chief took a morsel of food, held it to the sky, and then buried it as a peace offering to the Great Spirit. Many families offered thanks as they sat down to eat their meals in their tipis.

Comanche children ate pemmican, but this was primarily a tasty, high-energy food reserved for war parties. Carried in a parfleche pouch, pemmican was eaten only when the men did not have time to hunt. Similarly, in camp, people ate pemmican only when other food was scarce. Traders ate pemmican sliced and dipped in honey, which they called Indian bread.

This is just one example, far away from the diets now routinely consumed with the 600,000 choices in modern supermarkets

No and yes. No, because we have modules that assist you with tracking and measuring progress. You can partner with a buddie or contact a health care professional to monitor and work with you. The meals have a shopping list and easy to follow recipe or video.

The "yes" is due to fast food, sweets, crisps, biscuits and the like being so tempting and everywhere. It is essential to understand your why for adopting the programme. Standard dietary lifestyles add fat and increase sickness.  Others around you may not support your choice accidentally; they will continue to eat the tempting junk foods.  The junk will still be in the cupboards, at every fuel station, work.  Your "why" has to be stronger than the obstacles to success. 

The best way to not do a life changing ketogenic diet is to mix in the foods and drinks which made you look to dieting in the first place. There are over 600,000 supermarket foods worldwide. Try to picture how many food items there were circa 150 years ago in every society. The modern foods have been designed to hit the "bliss point". Bad fats (vegetable or more accurately labeled seed oils) when mixed with flour and sugar create many of the treats in societies. These are toxic and correlate with many modern diseases.

Cholesterol is in every cell in your body. Do you believe your body would be trying to harm you? In order for vitamin D from sunlight to be synthesised, adequate cholesterol within the body is required. Did you know that more persons die with so called normal cholesterol than high - where does this fact leave the push to lower cholesterol. Cholesterol is required for male and female sex hormones. Cholesterol repairs the body and is required for a strong immune response.  Your brain has 25% of the cholesterol in your body, is it wise to tamper with our evolutionary workings on the hypothesis that is still an hypothesis, where the author has been proved to misrepresented facts.

The "Diet Heart Hypothesis" was developed in the 1950's by Ancel Keys, this blamed fat and cholesterol for heart attacks and strokes; whilst there is a consensus among many in favour of the theory, there is no definitive proof that cholesterol is a bad actor. Would we say someone should be drained of blood if they contracted blood cancer?  There are tests which can see heart disease such as a coronary artery calcium (cac) scan rather than a guess (framingham) which is current standard of care. When the standard of care equation is compared to cac results in the same individuals it is embarassing the difference; we cannot keep giving our populations statins on this basis.

Advocates of the diet heart hypothesis cannot reconcile that post menopausal women show significant benefit to having high cholesterol. Everyone, especially women would do well to read or listen to the "Big Fat Surprise" by Nina Teicholz, and review the YouTube works of Dave Feldman and David Diamond.

Further reading / viewing:
Tamara Willner
Dr Jeffrey Gerber
Dr Malcolm Kendrick
Dr Paul Mason

You have most likely been eating in a carbohydrate heavy manner for decades.  Your body expects meals to be sugary either in the mouth, and or when broken down by digestion.  Switching to a low carb or ketogenic diet requires the body to build up mechanisms for digestion.

Eating cereals, fast foods usually with a bread wrapper, juices and the like are talked of as being "normal" eating.  This type of diet is the worst as it is designed by men and women is white gowns whose raison d'être is to tickle the food senses (bliss point), and ensure you are enticed to buy more.

Our ketodoit programme retrains your taste buds to an ancestral level.  This reset enables a renewed appreciation of foods.

Most people take 2 weeks to go from their current eating pattern to a healthy ketodoit whole food animal based dietary method.  This is a remarkably short period of time in comparison to years of mixed eating.  

Absolutely safe and delicious. We've eaten red meat for millennia. The longest living population are from Hong Kong and they eat the most meat. Doesn't this contradict the mainstream push? Yes, in order to sell an alternative, the narrative has to be true, otherwise "fake" foods would be consigned to history. What about the evidence? Review it, the tricks are to use anti-meat testers and studies that do not pass the scientific threshold to prove anything.  The contributors to this site believed the mantra, and suffered IBS, fat and diabetes.  Katie Baker was trained 3 times in the low fat, high carb, grain based methods as a fitness trainer, sports scientist and a physiotherapist - she would practically assign nutrition in real world scenarios, only to bin the indoctrination in favour of simple food that nature provides as a single ingredient.

Understandable. Here's a common sense rationale. Indigenous populations such as the Inuit and Maasai eat mostly meat and do not suffer the same non-communicative diseases of Western societies, such as diabetes and hypertension. Here are some websites with real people and their successes on mostly meat based diets:
- Meatrx
- Diabetes.co.uk
- Diet Doctor
- We have our own small successes, which we intend to grow.

Meat is at the heart of these successes at very close to 100% of the cases. What about the weight of the evidence? There has never been a study that crosses the scientific threshold of proof. IARC say eating bacon raises a risk of bowel cancer to 18% or 51 in 100,000, the standard risk is 43 in 100,000. The statistical gymnastics to have a rise of 8 equate to 18%, is achieved by a method called relative risk. Whist relative risk is a legitimate measurement "they" know it is misleading. The 8 increase was gained by asking people what they ate via a food frequency questionnaire.....enough said, revert back to the section above regarding the longest lived and what they eat. On these questionnaires, pizza for example is classed as meat.

When it comes to risk, take a fast food meal of burger and chips. They would say the burger pattie increases risk, whilst hundreds of medical professionals say the risk is in the rancid vegetable oil, the sugary burger bun and the high carb fries - we are right, they are wrong.

Food choices have recently been framed in the "plant based paradigm" which favours commercial products not whole foods such as carrot or courgettes (always something packaged and mixed with loads of ingredients).  We prefer history to tell the truth about real food.  In Britain for example if you have relatives who are around 70 to 90 years old, ask them what they ate as a child.  Review for yourself what hunter gathers used to eat, and what those who still survive now eat (those not influenced by Western foods, such as in the Amazon).  The Maasi, Hadza, Inuit are good examples.  Most have in common a meat and or fish as the primary must have base of their diets with berries and tubers for subsistence (check this for yourself).  Below is an example of what the Commanche indians ate.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comanche):
The Comanche were initially hunter-gatherers. When they lived in the Rocky Mountains, during their migration to the Great Plains, both men and women shared the responsibility of gathering and providing food. When the Comanche reached the plains, hunting came to predominate. Hunting was considered a male activity and was a principal source of prestige. For meat, the Comanche hunted buffalo, elk, black bear, pronghorn, and deer. When game was scarce, the men hunted wild mustangs, sometimes eating their own ponies. In later years the Comanche raided Texas ranches and stole longhorn cattle. They did not eat fish or fowl, unless starving, when they would eat virtually any creature they could catch, including armadillos, skunks, rats, lizards, frogs, and grasshoppers. Buffalo meat and other game was prepared and cooked by the women. The women also gathered wild fruits, seeds, nuts, berries, roots, and tubers — including plums, grapes, juniper berries, persimmons, mulberries, acorns, pecans, wild onions, radishes, and the fruit of the prickly pear cactus. The Comanche also acquired maize, dried pumpkin, and tobacco through trade and raids. Most meats were roasted over a fire or boiled. To boil fresh or dried meat and vegetables, women dug a pit in the ground, which they lined with animal skins or buffalo stomach and filled with water to make a kind of cooking pot. They placed heated stones in the water until it boiled and had cooked their stew. After they came into contact with the Spanish, the Comanche traded for copper pots and iron kettles, which made cooking easier.

Women used berries and nuts, as well as honey and tallow, to flavor buffalo meat. They stored the tallow in intestine casings or rawhide pouches called oyóotû¿. They especially liked to make a sweet mush of buffalo marrow mixed with crushed mesquite beans.

The Comanches sometimes ate raw meat, especially raw liver flavored with gall. They also drank the milk from the slashed udders of buffalo, deer, and elk.  Among their delicacies was the curdled milk from the stomachs of suckling buffalo calves. They also enjoyed buffalo tripe, or stomachs.

Comanche people generally had a light meal in the morning and a large evening meal. During the day they ate whenever they were hungry or when it was convenient. Like other Plains Indians, the Comanche were very hospitable people. They prepared meals whenever a visitor arrived in camp, which led to outsiders' belief that the Comanches ate at all hours of the day or night. Before calling a public event, the chief took a morsel of food, held it to the sky, and then buried it as a peace offering to the Great Spirit. Many families offered thanks as they sat down to eat their meals in their tipis.

Comanche children ate pemmican, but this was primarily a tasty, high-energy food reserved for war parties. Carried in a parfleche pouch, pemmican was eaten only when the men did not have time to hunt. Similarly, in camp, people ate pemmican only when other food was scarce. Traders ate pemmican sliced and dipped in honey, which they called Indian bread.

This is just one example, far away from the diets now routinely consumed with the 600,000 choices in modern supermarkets

No and yes. No, because we have modules that assist you with tracking and measuring progress. You can partner with a buddie or contact a health care professional to monitor and work with you. The meals have a shopping list and easy to follow recipe or video.

The "yes" is due to fast food, sweets, crisps, biscuits and the like being so tempting and everywhere. It is essential to understand your why for adopting the programme. Standard dietary lifestyles add fat and increase sickness.  Others around you may not support your choice accidentally; they will continue to eat the tempting junk foods.  The junk will still be in the cupboards, at every fuel station, work.  Your "why" has to be stronger than the obstacles to success. 

The best way to not do a life changing ketogenic diet is to mix in the foods and drinks which made you look to dieting in the first place. There are over 600,000 supermarket foods worldwide. Try to picture how many food items there were circa 150 years ago in every society. The modern foods have been designed to hit the "bliss point". Bad fats (vegetable or more accurately labeled seed oils) when mixed with flour and sugar create many of the treats in societies. These are toxic and correlate with many modern diseases.

Cholesterol is in every cell in your body. Do you believe your body would be trying to harm you? In order for vitamin D from sunlight to be synthesised, adequate cholesterol within the body is required. Did you know that more persons die with so called normal cholesterol than high - where does this fact leave the push to lower cholesterol. Cholesterol is required for male and female sex hormones. Cholesterol repairs the body and is required for a strong immune response.  Your brain has 25% of the cholesterol in your body, is it wise to tamper with our evolutionary workings on the hypothesis that is still an hypothesis, where the author has been proved to misrepresented facts.

The "Diet Heart Hypothesis" was developed in the 1950's by Ancel Keys, this blamed fat and cholesterol for heart attacks and strokes; whilst there is a consensus among many in favour of the theory, there is no definitive proof that cholesterol is a bad actor. Would we say someone should be drained of blood if they contracted blood cancer?  There are tests which can see heart disease such as a coronary artery calcium (cac) scan rather than a guess (framingham) which is current standard of care. When the standard of care equation is compared to cac results in the same individuals it is embarassing the difference; we cannot keep giving our populations statins on this basis.

Advocates of the diet heart hypothesis cannot reconcile that post menopausal women show significant benefit to having high cholesterol. Everyone, especially women would do well to read or listen to the "Big Fat Surprise" by Nina Teicholz, and review the YouTube works of Dave Feldman and David Diamond.

Further reading / viewing:
Tamara Willner
Dr Jeffrey Gerber
Dr Malcolm Kendrick
Dr Paul Mason

  • Health Monitoring. Get to know what metrics you sure understand Try it now!
  • Meal Plans.  Get database driven meal plans which you can customise. Try it now!
  • Work with family & friends. Or include a health care professional or personal trainer. Try it now!

Food Recipes

Forum

Educational Videos

Exercise

  • 100's of Biomarkers with Charts. HbA1c, HDL, LDL, Urea Level, etc Try it now!
  • Exercise.  Several easy exercise regimes for all levels with video guidance. Try it now!
  • Diabetes Management. Aim for remission, we will help you. Try it now!

Fat

Obtain the truth about Fat

Dr Paul Mason

Dr Zoe Harcombe

Fat / Cholesterol

Obtain the truth about Cholesterol

Dr Assem Malhotra

Dr David Diamond

Understanding The Truth Would Cost Billions

We have independent Engineers...They don't
Diet Heart Hypothesis

In 1958 he launched the Seven Countries Study, researching the relationship between dietary patterns and the prevalence of coronary heart disease in countries such as Greece, Italy, Spain, South Africa, Japan, and Finland. This flawed study was to have the most profound impact on dietary guidelines to this day.  Keys had concluded that saturated fats as found in milk and meat have adverse effects, while unsaturated fats found in vegetable oils had beneficial effects, largely by the hypothesis that all dietary fats cause obesity and cancer.

Keys missed out 14 countries which inconvenienced his findings, such as Germany and France.

This hypothesis morphed from total cholesterol being an issue to "LDL-c", and fat in general to "Saturated Fat".  This led to the billion dollar statins industry, the demonisation of red meat and dairy to the benefit of low fat, high carb food-like items.
Read more..

Dave Feldman - Software Engineer

Is a senior software engineer and entrepreneur.

Began a Low Carb, High Fat diet in April 2015 due to pre-diabetes.  His cholesterol lipid numbers spiked substantially after going on the diet. Dave spotted a pattern in the lipid system that’s very similar to distributed objects in networks.

Dave has been able to show that by manipulating his diet (for 3 days) he can make a mockery of the foundations of the Diet Heart Hypothesis "Feldman Protocol".

Dave has also downloaded the largest publicly available Nhanes dataset, with detailed information collated by the Americans in most aspects of cholesterol.  The takeaway is that more people die with so called lower normal cholesterol (LDL-c)

  . Read more..

Ivor Cummins - Biochemical Engineer

An advanced problem solving leader.

Similar to Dave Feldman, Ivor had some metabolic issues to address after health tests.  Ivor used his engineering logic to root cause and fix the issues his doctor was struggling with in the context of the current dogmas.

Ivor's mentor David Bobbet, a millionaire Irish businessman, had aced most health tests including those for diabetes.  It transpired that David had excessive plaques within his arteries, not picked up by the regular cholesterol tests.  A Coronary Artery Calcium (CAC) scan looks within the arteries and saw the disease, compared to the standard used (Framingham equation, which assists in dishing out statins).

He has additionally highlighted the risk factors that were present in a univariate and multivariate study of second heart attacks following persons for years after the first attack.  The results were Univariate Risk Ratio:
- Hypertension history 1.9x  (Highly significant)
- Diastolic BP > 80 )mm Hg) 1.6x (Highly significant)
Total Cholesterol > 200 mg/dl 1.5x (borderline significant)
LDL > 130 mg/dl 1.4x (non-significant)

Multivariate Risk Ratio:
Total Cholesterol ~1x (non-significant)
LDL ~1x (non-significant)
Insulin 6.7x (Highly significant)


Read more..

British Medical Journal (BMJ)

What Do They Say About Cholesterol (LDL-c)

Abstract
Objective It is well known that total cholesterol becomes less of a risk factor or not at all for all-cause and cardiovascular (CV) mortality with increasing age, but as little is known as to whether low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), one component of total cholesterol, is associated with mortality in the elderly, we decided to investigate this issue.

Setting, participants and outcome measures We sought PubMed for cohort studies, where LDL-C had been investigated as a risk factor for all-cause and/or CV mortality in individuals ≥60 years from the general population.

Results We identified 19 cohort studies including 30 cohorts with a total of 68 094 elderly people, where all-cause mortality was recorded in 28 cohorts and CV mortality in 9 cohorts. Inverse association between all-cause mortality and LDL-C was seen in 16 cohorts (in 14 with statistical significance) representing 92% of the number of participants, where this association was recorded. In the rest, no association was found. In two cohorts, CV mortality was highest in the lowest LDL-C quartile and with statistical significance; in seven cohorts, no association was found.

Conclusions High LDL-C is inversely associated with mortality in most people over 60 years. This finding is inconsistent with the cholesterol hypothesis (ie, that cholesterol, particularly LDL-C, is inherently atherogenic). Since elderly people with high LDL-C live as long or longer than those with low LDL-C, our analysis provides reason to question the validity of the cholesterol hypothesis. Moreover, our study provides the rationale for a re-evaluation of guidelines recommending pharmacological reduction of LDL-C in the elderly as a component of cardiovascular disease prevention strategies.

What Do Others Say

Saturated Fat & LDL-c

"We have categorized statins for low-risk patients as red, or not recommended, based on certain value judgments. Statin studies, mostly industry sponsored, used methods such as run-out phases, and the raw trial data continue to be withheld by manufacturers despite many requests by independent groups. Thus, it is reasonable to assume that the reported benefits represent a best-case, whereas harms are most likely underestimated. In addition, although statin-induced muscle symptoms are at least five times more likely than any benefit, this is typically reversible. The decision not to categorize statins for low-risk patients as black, or harms greater than benefits, is based on value judgments about this compared with cardiovascular events. This decision becomes trickier when considering the additional burden of statin-induced diabetes. One large, high-quality trial did not find an increase in diabetes risk. However, originally unpublished results from the Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial failed to disclose that the NNH for new-onset diabetes was just 38 in patients treated with atorvastatin (Lipitor), 80 mg, compared with placebo."

"...unless LDL levels are very high (7.8 mmol/L or higher), they have no value, in isolation, in predicting those individuals at risks of CHD"

They don't measure LDL-c.  They tend to review Cholesterol/HDL ratio, where cholesterol is the total number.  E.g. https://qrisk.org/three/

This trial was meant to show that reducing Saturated Fat, Cholesterol amongst other areas would reduce Coronary Heart Disease (CHD) - it did'nt show the intended results.

(https://www.crossfit.com/essentials/multiple-risk-factor-intervention-trial-risk-factor-changes-and-mortality-results)
MRFIT, published in 1982, randomized 12,866 high-risk men (men who smoked or had high cholesterol or blood pressure, but who had not previously had a heart attack) to a complex intervention or control. The “special intervention” for the former group included (1) cessation of cigarette smoking, (2) weight loss, (3) hypertensive medication, and (4) nutritional counseling, with a focus on reducing saturated fat and cholesterol intake. Controls were given no special treatment. Subjects were followed for an average of seven years.

The intervention was successful in achieving its targets. The special intervention (SI) group saw greater decreases in blood pressure, serum cholesterol, and smoking rates over the course of six annual visits, compared to usual care (UC) controls. The groups were well-matched at baseline, and by year six, the SI group’s mean DBP was 3 mm Hg lower, serum cholesterol 5 mg/dL lower (entirely accounted for by an LDL decrease), and smoking rates 13% lower (32% vs 45%).

The primary outcome, however, was CHD mortality, and here the trial failed to show an impact. Over six years, there were 92 CHD deaths in the SI group (out of 6,428 initial participants) and 104 in the UC group (from 6,438 participants)—an improvement in mortality that did not reach statistical significance. The difference in all-cause mortality was even smaller, with 265 deaths in the SI group and 260 in the UC. It may be worth noting that the single largest difference between the groups in terms of mortality by a specific cause was related to deaths due to cancer, which numbered 81 in the SI group and 69 in UC.

Overall, this trial failed to demonstrate that lowering cholesterol (via reduction in cholesterol and saturated fat intake), ceasing smoking, and normalizing blood pressure together significantly decreases heart disease risk in high-risk men, and the combinatorial therapy makes it impossible to discern the positive (or even negative, as in the case of drug-based blood pressure lowering) impact of each treatment element individually.

The low fat aspect of the diet showed again that lowering cholesterol had no impact on heart disease:

(https://thebms.org.uk/2006/04/womens-health-initiative-the-final-outcome/):
A low fat diet was hypothesized to reduce the risk of breast and colorectal cancer and cardiovascular disease [5,6,7]. 19, 541 women were assigned to a diet with reduced total fat intake (20% total energy) and increased intakes of vegetables, fruits, and grains. The comparison group of 29, 294 women did not have any dietary changes. Mean follow-up was 8.1 years. The dietary intervention did not significantly reduce the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, cardiovascular disease, breast or colorectal cancer.

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Women's_Health_Initiative):
Dietary modification
The dietary modification (DM) trial was conducted with the purpose of identifying the effects of a low-fat eating pattern; the primary outcome measures were the incidence of invasive breast and colorectal cancers, fatal and nonfatal coronary heart disease (CHD), stroke, and overall cardiovascular disease (CVD), calculated as a composite of CHD and stroke.

Women in the trial were randomly assigned to the dietary intervention group (40%; n = 19541) or the control group (60%; n = 29294). In addition to the global exclusion criteria, component-specific exclusion criteria included prior breast cancer, colorectal cancer, other cancers excluding nonmelanoma skin cancer in the past 10 years, adherence or retention concerns (e.g., a substance abuse history or dementia), or a baseline diet that included a fat intake accounting for less than 32% of total energy intake.

Participants in the intervention group underwent a regimen of trainings, group meetings, and consultations which encouraged low-fat eating habits, targeted to 20% of daily caloric intake, along with increasing the consumption of fruits, vegetables, and grains. Those assigned to the control group were not asked to adopt any specific dietary changes.

DM component findings
The mean follow-up for the DM intervention was 8.1 years. At study years 1 and 6, the dietary fat intake levels for the intervention group were 10.7% and 8.2% less than those of the control group, respectively. The results indicated that, despite some reduction in CVD risk factors (e.g., blood lipids and diastolic blood pressure), there was no significant reduction in the risk of CHD, stroke, or CVD, indicating that a more focused combination of diet and lifestyle interventions may be required to further improve CVD risk factors and reduce overall risk. In addition, no statistically significant reduction in breast cancer risk was identified, although the results approached significance and indicated that longer-term follow-up may yield a more definitive comparison. The trial also did not identify a reduction in colorectal cancer risk attributable to a low-fat dietary pattern.

Other Assessments (https://www.reddit.com/r/ScientificNutrition/comments/d1vdrx/lowfat_dietary_pattern_among_postmenopausal_women/):
https://www.hsph.harvard.edu/nutritionsource/2006/02/09/low-fat-diet-not-a-cure-all-womens-health-initiative/

The results, published in the Journal of the American Medical Association, showed no benefits for a low-fat diet. Women assigned to this eating strategy did not appear to gain protection against breast cancer, colorectal cancer, or cardiovascular disease. And after eight years, their weights were generally the same as those of women following their usual diets.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16467232?dopt=Citation

a low-fat dietary pattern did not result in a statistically significant reduction in invasive breast cancer risk over an 8.1-year average follow-up period.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16467233?dopt=Citation

In this study, a low-fat dietary pattern intervention did not reduce the risk of colorectal cancer in postmenopausal women during 8.1 years of follow-up.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16467234?dopt=Citation

a dietary intervention that reduced total fat intake and increased intakes of vegetables, fruits, and grains did not significantly reduce the risk of CHD, stroke, or CVD

Carbohyrates

Obtain the truth about Carbs

BBC

Dr Zyrowski

Surprised by the sugar scores. Carbs turn into sugar when eaten.

What About Protein

Protein is an essential nutrient for a healthy body. skin, blood cells, nails and immunity. Essential means our bodies cannot make (synthesis this), so an exogenous intake is required, “essential amino acids” are also call “indispensable amino-acids (IAAs)”. Approximately 50% of the bodies dry weight consists of protein. During food digestion proteins are broken down to amino acids, which form enzymes and hormones like serotonin and adrenaline. Animal proteins are “complete”. Plant based proteins need to be stacked to ensure full amino acids are covered.

Meat, is broken down into individual proteins by the gastric juices in the stomach. Pancreatic enzymes used within the small intestine, called the duodenum, breakdown the proteins into different amino acids. The amino acids are absorbed into the intestine walls via villi which resemble small fingers. The amino acids are then transported by blood to the liver.

Guidelines state that circa 0.8 grams per kg of body weight should be consumed per day. We believe up to 2 grams per kilogram for those who work out is fine. There is a concern that too much protein is detrimental to the kidneys; this may be the case for those who have a pre-existing condition, but there is no relationship for kidney issues in those without an existing condition.

Climate change is real. Agenda based parties claim cows are to blame.

The Climate

Brian Sanders
Please watch and see if this makes sense.  You already know through your life experience, maybe politics or work, that the truth sometimes doesn't matter.  Did you know for example that most Type 2 diabetics who put their condition into remission are meat eaters, well over 90%.  How does this sit with the claims from the plant based pushers that meat causes diabetes?  For each plant based film, such as what the health or cow spiracy, fact check these by searching YouTube with the word "debunk".

The science is not settled

Do you remember the diesel fuel debacle or how about tabacco or what is live right now, sugar.  What these all have in common is that the "anointed" authorities have tried to make these problems seem like there is nothing to see here.

There is an element within the climate change movement that has sneakily bolted onto this great agenda a notion that cows are bad for the environment. "We" have proof that cows raised in a holistic manner can and do become not just carbon neutral, but that they positively sequester carbon.  Keywords for your research are the Savory Institute, White Oak Pastures (they have verification of positive carbon sequestration), Joel Salitin, Frank Mitloehner to be starting with.  Once you hear and see this side you the lie will be uncovered.

Soil health is superior with holistic management using animals.  For Type 2 Diabetics who cannot tolerate carbs, meat, fish and diary lower blood sugars into the "normal" range; this saves limbs, eyesight, strokes, heart attacks, cancers etc.  Should they be denied up to 10 years of life due to misinformation, politics and ideology?

Fact check everything.  Everything.  Even what is on this site.

So what about The Game Changers movie

Watch Game Changers on Netflix or Amazon. Then watch the alternative - someone telling porkies.
Further opinion Zoe Harcombe

We already consume a diet that is circa 60% Plant Based (bread, rice, potatoes etc)

We respect peoples right to choose the dietary pattern they wish to live by.  We have concerns for the children who do not have a choice.  The concern comes out of no Vegan societies ever existing in the past or current, that we can reference tor health outcomes.  Veganism is around 70 years old.  Also some quick YouTube research shows the condition of some Vegans who are "not doing it right".  For a small minority who can tolerate the sugar and carb load of a Vegan diet good for them; on American statistics 88% of the population are metabolically ill with 50% diabetic or pre-diabetic - not a good match for a high carb Vegan diet.  The prominent Peta activist and Vegan, Dr Neal Barnard's diabetes results (a randomised clincal trial, which is the gold standard) produces results inferior to every Dr who practices low carb / ketogenic medicine, by a sizable margin.  How can you fix a sugar intolerance condition with a diet that is high in sugar (carbs)?

When Moyle Baker was reversing his Type 2, he was able to just get into the diabetes remission numbers (HbA1c of 41) when eating a plant based diet with lots of roasted vegetables, green smoothies and reducing meat with stacks of exercise.  No matter how much exercise he did 41 was the lowest possible.  Switching to more meat, fish and dairy yielded HbA1c's of between 35 and 38 (original 143), strength and muscle improvements beyond Moyle's expectations.  Similar diabetes results are seen with low carbers / ketogentic and or carnivore advocates. 

Our Team

Katie Baker
Physiotherapist

I am here to help and assist with your fat loss and or condition

Moyle Baker
Cloud Computing Specialist

Technical support and have had my diabetes reversed by Katie

Mobirise

Contact Us

Fill this form and we'll get back to you soon.

© Copyright 2020 Ketodoit. All Rights Reserved.

Create a website - Get now